Something funny to close 2009 and to start 2010.
Enjoy and Happy New Year !
I am a big fan of Sean and his site the Park Paradigm. He was the guy who made the famous AmazonBay2015 video.
That was 2006.
The video of his presentation is 20 min. It’s worth your time.
Two extracts of this presentation should get your attention, and incentivize you to read on:
- What is the difference between a bank and a telecom company really ?
- The difference between bank messaging and telcos is disappearing.
I believe this presentation is VERY VERY relevant to financial services and concepts such a marketplaces for financial services.
This presentation gives you an absolute macro-evolution view on why this is a bound to be happen, and why the inherent structures of our current – usually vertical integrated – behemoth companies will struggle very hard to get their arms around this if they even ever succeed it spotting this as a HUGE opportunity.
The essence of the story is that those
vertically integrated companies
will be replaced/challenged
by horizontally connected entities
to the marketplace
The innovation will happen
at the edges of the marketplace.
The marketplace is not even
It’s an essential piece of
A lot of Sean’s thinking is based on the work of Carlota Perez and her book “Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages”
Professor Carlota Perez is a Venezuelan scholar and expert on technology and socio-economic development most famous for her concept of Techno-Economic Paradigm Shifts and her theory of great surges, a further development of the Kondratieff waves.
Courtesy The Park Paradigm & Carlota Perez book.
Sean Park’s claim is that we are now getting into the 6th paradigm, and this is also a switching point between 2 phases.
Sean Park believes the drivers will be 3-fold:
1) Cloud computing, with EVERYTHING as a Service
2) Exchange Ubiquity. The marketplace as plumbing, i would call this
The last one “Digitization” seems “obvious”, unless you push this to the limits, as Sean Park does:
He takes the example of ISBN numbers as one of the success factors of Amazon’s book shop. Sure, there is big logistical tail to the book shop, the the core of the Amazon model is digitized, i.e the ISBN is just an identifier, linked to plenty of content and metadata, that can be accessed by an eco-system through APIs.
Where it even becomes more interesting, is where Sean mixes this up with theories of complex adaptive systems. It’s basically saying that
those horizontally integrated value chains
are chains of nearly decomposable services
And please read this in the context of nearly decomposable
And (traditional) vertically integrated companies (offering financial services) will not be able to compete successfully in rate of adaptation and fitness with these horizontally integrated “engines” or “eco-systems”.
Sean asks the question:
Where is the AppStore for Financial Services ?
here is the digital platform + API’s for the financial industry ?
Where are the decomposable financial services that can thrive on such marketplace ?
Sean has some other great disruptive statements. Like this one:
Its about the shift
It looks like Sean’s company is looking to invest in companies that understand how to build and offer these decomposable services.
But who should invest in the marketplace,
the “dumb” but highly secure pipes
for the financial industry ?
We could let every Bank behemoth have it’s chance at it. That may be great for lock in. But in the long term, we will need something that is highly interoperable.
into the DNA
of this Digital Platform.
That is run as a service for the community. And to be the “invisible engine” for financial services cloud computing.
It’s only a very personal opinion, but i believe SWIFT is quite uniquely positioned to play this role.
We are already in full prep for our 2010 SWIFT Innovation activities. It should be obvious from the above that we have Sean Park on our list of speakers to be contacted for our Innotribe event series, and who know at Sibos 2010 in Amsterdam ?
My previous post on Zemanta got quite some traction ;-)
I even got a comment from Jim Hirshfield, VP of Biz Dev at Zemanta. He sent me a link to a demo of their API. Here is what he sent me:
Peter – What a great write up on Zemanta. Thanks.
If you’re interested in the underlying technology of Zemanta and structured data, then I think you might find this demonstration interesting as well:
This shows what can be done with our API when combined with other players in the space.
VP of Biz Dev at Zemanta
So, obviously, i had to try it out… If you click the link above, you get this:
And Hudson River leads you here:
Yep, we get close to real-time object modeling.
For those who do not know what this is about, here is once more the video animation of what happened.
Have fun !
And i was lucky to see it in 3D. What an experience! First of all, it was quite some time since i ever went to the “cinéma”, and this was also my first 3D movie ever. I was absolutely surprised by the quality of it.
For me, this movie had the same impact as 1968 ! movie “2001: A Space Odyssey”
Without telling too much about the story and the plot, how i would like to fly that chopper !
And how i’d wish that the tablet PC in the movie is what Apple is going to release in Jan 2010 ! Or to have one of those fantastic displays ;-)
You will also recognize music that makes you think of the final sequence of Titanic.
It’s mind-blowing. In the beginning of the film, you feel really surprised how real the characters, and the fauna and flora are. That’s ok for 5 min, but then you start realizing this goes on for about 2 hours, and the makers of the film immerse you in some semi-real environment, and you feel as being part of it, and you feel part of the story and engaged. A masterpiece.
You have to see it. Don’t compromise on a non-3D version.
And stay till the end, and have a look at the credits. An endless list of specialists that have contributed to the movie. A true 2010 Enterprise.
And to close, here is a quiz: at the end of the film, the main character Jake Sully does his last “videolog”. What is the exact date that is shown on the videolog display ?
In my previous blog “Brand, Workforce and Innovation”, i started making a case for a leadership role for HR in Innovation.
I’d love to see more HR in a true leadership role. Leadership as opposite to management in its narrow definition of executing a course set out by somebody else. See also below the very important message about the role for HR in creating the eminence of our workforce.
Checkout my previous post on what is meant with “eminence of our workforce”.
I would like to mix this with some thoughts from Rowan Gibson recently on Blogging Innovation. His full posting can be found here but i will explore some key findings below. Rowan Gibson is the author of “Innovation to the Core”.
UPDATE: what a co-incidence. Just today, Rowan Gibson did a new post in essence giving a one-page summary of his book. Here is the link to “Do you have a Corporate Innovation System?”
Innovation to the core” is about putting
radical innovation in the core of
and is not to be confused with the discussing
Innovation in the core or beyond the core
of your product portfolio
UPDATE: “Beyond the Core” is a book by Chris Zook, and is based on the principle of adjacencies. It seems to be the bible for anybody not wanting to do anything beyond the core. It dates back from begin 2005, and is in my opinion completely outdated as a guide for innovation.
Rowan says in his blog:
In essence, that means developing a particular mix of resources, processes and values that makes it hard for rivals to match what the company does.
This has to do – amongst others – to create this eminence in the work-force.
But it is much more.
Lastly, i was attending one of our company meetings, and our CEO was doing a pitch on the focus of innovation in 2010. Great to have your CEO on board to get innovation rolling ! Really, it makes a big difference. But at the same time, the company runs a 2-year lean-program to build greater efficiencies in the company processes.
In French, we call this “Le grand écart”.
It’s difficult, but not impossible if you’re fit and trained.
People do not understand this, cannot digest, don’t see the big picture, as the efficiency programs are much closer to their daily lives and – most of all – their jobs.
You could see the glaze in the eyes of some folks when we were talking innovation after having explained the lean-part.
As long as we do not succeed as positioning innovation as “buying our future”, as essential to building the greatest workforce on earth and giving the people the possibility of being part of that – with reward mechanisms – we won’t succeed in those apparent conflicting objectives.
Rowan Gibson goes on:
Making innovation a systemic organizational capability is a complex and multifaceted challenge. It simply cannot be solved with some Band-Aid or silver bullet. Instead, it requires deep and enduring changes to leadership focus, performance metrics, organization charts, management processes, IT systems, training programs, incentive and reward structures, cultural environment and values.
It’s not “good enough” to have your CEO on board. You need the full buy-in of your full Executive Committee, and – in a more complex co-operative organization like SWIFT – the buy-in of your Members, represented by the Board. We still have a lot of work to do, but i believe we are getting there. Innovation is now getting at the agenda of those deciding constituencies.
What i have not yet seen is a focus on how HR can help and be instrumental for innovation.
What companies need is not merely a pro-innovation mindset, or better brainstorming techniques, or "hot teams". It’s about making innovation a new organizational way of life; something that permeates everything a company does, in every corner of its business, every single day. It’s about infusing the entire lifeblood of an organization with the tools, skills, methods and processes of radical innovation. That’s the true imperative for rethinking the role of Human Resources. As soon as we recognize the strategic value and the immense organizational transition that’s involved in building a corporate-wide innovation capability, HR automatically moves to center stage.
And what would be the role of HR in such an Innovation context ?
Who else but HR leaders would be capable of turning a company’s strategic intent with regard to innovation into tangible everyday action? Who else could make the necessary changes to executive roles and goals, political infrastructures, recruitment strategy, broad-based training, performance appraisals, awards and incentives, employee contribution and commitment, value systems, and so on? Who else could build and foster the cultural and constitutional conditions – such as a discretionary time allowance for innovation projects, maximum diversity in the composition of innovation teams, and rampant connection and conversation across the organization – that serve as catalysts for breakthrough innovation? Who else could ensure that each employee understands the link between his or her own performance (as well as compensation) and the attainment of the company’s innovation strategy?
In short, who else but HR
leaders could create a company
where everyone, everywhere,
is responsible for innovation
every day whether as an
innovator, mentor, manager, or
I have become a big believer that companies need an innovation system where
everybody in the company
becomes an innovator
It’s almost a human right of any employee in a company, i would even venture it is a moral obligation for any employee in a company to be an innovator himself. It is NOT the sole privilege of the innovation team to come up with ideas, on the contrary. See in this context my previous blog on The Holy Fire.
Rowan Gibson has a great closing in his blog post:
The sad reality is that too many CEOs overlook HR’s potential in this regard. They still think of HR solely in terms of regulatory compliance, hiring and firing, employee comfort, compensation and benefits. Notably, Jack Welch, illustrious ex-CEO of GE and arguably one of the greatest corporate leaders of our times, sees things differently. In a recent column in BusinessWeek, he writes that
"every CEO should elevate his
head of HR to the same stature
as the CFO."
Hope somebody reads this.
Thanks to my subscription to Fredzimmy’s blog, I found this wonderful blog from Esko Kilpi.
I really recommend you to explore this site from A to Z.
MIT Media Lab Human Dynamics Group, Howard Rheingold (one of the first ever “internet”-books i ever bought,…, Barbarian Blog.
Yummy, Yummy. This is great stuff for a Sunday afternoon. So inspiring. Delicious ;-)
This way, i discovered the FANTASTIC Web 2.0 Expo speech of Douglas Rushkoff about Radical Abundance.
It is a 15 min video, and worth every minute:
Not sure if the video embed worked, so in any case you can find it here by clicking the below image.
Some mind-blowing quotes (in 140 characters ;-):
I was watching this morning a television program with Christine Van Den Wyngaert.
The program was in essence about her views and role in the Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, but mu attention was triggered by something she said in the introductory part of the interview.
She was referring to the dramatic decrease of the quality of our education, mainly due to the Bologna Treaty. Just have a look at the Wikipedia link or do a google on Bologna Treaty. Or have a look at the Europa site. The first sentence on that site reads:
The Bologna process aims inter alia at making divergent higher education systems converge towards a more transparent system by 2010, based on three cycles: Degree/Bachelor – Master – Doctorate.
I always get irritated when people talk about “convergence” or “consensus” or “compromise”. For me these terms have a built-in notion of quality-loss.
Indeed, Christine Van Den Wyngaert explains that “thanks” to this treaty it was not possible anymore – no, even forbidden – to offer education with the same high quality standards as we used to have.
All this in the name of democratization of education and to give everybody access to higher education.
She went on by stating that many base foundation courses of general knowledge were being reduced to the level of “kindergarten”.
And that for some professions – definitely for a judge or a lawyer – good solid foundation education about history, society, etc are quite fundamental for doing the profession.
It is getting pedantic in a sense that even talking about creating an “elite” of scientists, judges, of whatever profession starts being banned straight-away.
I do not want my child being educated in mediocrity.
It made me think of the book “The Five Minds of the Future” by Howard Gardner.
I am reading it on my Kindle as we speak.
In that book, Howard Gardner arguments that education should not only be based on memorizing lots of information, but that education (whether at school or at home) should more focus on some essential skills that will be needed in the future (of real-time, high-information-based-society).
He calls these the 5 “minds” for the future. They are:
About these “minds”, Gardner says:
Any individual with a deep understanding of a topic or method can think about it in a variety of ways. Conversely, an individual exhibits her current limitations when she can only conceptualize her topic in a single way.
This is very similar to having a very limited palette of ways to express yourself. Sometimes you hear somebody saying “I cannot dance on this or that sort of music. If i have to dance to that music, i cannot be myself (in an authentic way")”.
That’s pretty poor, if you ask me.
The art is to expand your palette of ways of being yourself in different situations.
Having the right to (the old) high standards of education, being trained in the 5 minds of the future, learning to be authentic in many different ways: all this should be part of the educational package of any young person having some ambitions for the longer term future.
I have come to a point where i do NOT believe anymore that our politicians and the whole system of lobby groups will help us getting there.
I was making the same reflection some weeks ago, when we were having our meeting of the Think Tank on Long Term Future, when i heard my friends complaining on how bad is it is getting in Flanders with respect to getting innovation on the political or any other agenda.
The innovation and education and
get drowned into a political swamp
of consensus and power games
The end result is often or nothing, or something very grey (because of the consensus), or something very Kafkaesque.
I am getting convinced we have to do it
Bring together some smart people in our think tank, and get private funding for the innovation, education and cultural development of the Generation-M.
Because they are looking for the things that really matter.
If you want to have an idea what Semantic Web can mean for you and your business, have a look at www.zemanta.com.
I tested the Google Chrome extension on my PC. In this case a Mini-HP with Windows 7 installed. I also use Windows Live Writer to do my blogs. Zemanta also has a Live Writer Plug-in that i also installed.
This looks quite similar to the viewer of Open Calais that i commented on already way back in April 2009.
UPDATE: just today, there was an article on ReadWriteWeb referring back to Open Calais, Google and Wolfram Alpha. Note that “Semantic Web” is now renamed into “Structured Data”.
But is is way more user-friendly, and so well integrated with Live Writer. Anybody writing blogs should install this.
To get you an idea of the powerful stuff under the hood of this semantic engine, go to the home page and click on the try demo button.
You then get presented with an free-text box that you can fill with any text you want. In my case, i just cut and pasted the intro-section of our Think Tank document.
You just hit “Run Demo”, and what you get then is really unbelievable !
Your content gets enhanced with images. See example below.
Or you get links to related articles:
The beauty really comes and the end of the page of the demo:
Yep, you got it. It shows all in-text links, and all words that have automatically semantically tagged, based on the sources you have given during set-up (or later when logging into your personal account). And yes, it also looks into Twitter and Facebook.
When you install Zemanta for Live Writer, you are presented with a list of recommended articles while you are blogging. You can then select interesting and related articles to reference in your blogs posts with just a click of the mouse. The benefits of being included within our recommended content pool are: trackback links to your blog, discovery of your blog by new readers, and connecting topical blogs together.
Zemanta expands the author’s regular blogging dashboard, populating it on the fly with content suggestions relevant to the current text. It presents images, links, articles, tags in a simple interface. It encourages re-use and linking to other content with as little effort as possible – a single click.
Here is a screenshot of my screen as i was making this blog, and how it automatically added in-text links to the word “Blogger” etc above…
Main features of Zemanta are:
● on the fly contextual suggestions of related articles, images, links and tags;
● affiliate linking support;
● re-blogging – cross-platform quoting for blogs;
● spam-free database of 10000 news sources and blogs;
● copyright filtering of suggested images.
Use cases for email include:
● Individualized personal “postcards” as you can easily add images from your Flickr collection or from others.
● Persuasive professional introductions with easy addition of personal images and links to social networks.
● Informative report-style mails with links to other points on Internet for further reading.
These are the use cases suggested on the Zemanta site and during the install procedure.
However, i strongly believe that these sort of technologies will change in a very disruptive way how we think about standards. In the context of my employer SWIFT, standards are one of the pillars of our value proposition. So far, we “only” looked at standards for message formats, but we could/should apply our 30+ years experience in semantics and ontologies for financial services into this new domain of semantics of … well, anything.
UPDATE: by renaming “Semantic Web” into “Structured Data”, it all becomes even more obvious what role SWIFT could play in this area. XBRL and CLOUD are already moving big way into this space.
BTW: the “REBLOG” button at the end of this posting was also added automatically by Zemanta.
Another great article on Technology Review MIT, this time about cloud computing. Together with the 2 documents i posted earlier today on innotribe.com this should give the average IT literate reader a good overview of where we stand end 2009/begin 2010.
The clientele for Amazon’s cloud services now includes the New York Times and Pfizer. And Google’s browser and forthcoming operating system (both named Chrome) mean to provide easy access to cloud applications.
The focus of IT innovation has shifted from hardware to software applications
But not everyone is so sanguine. At a computer security conference last spring, John Chambers, the chairman of Cisco Systems, called cloud computing a "security nightmare" that "can’t be handled in traditional ways."
A similar viewpoint, if less colorfully expressed, animates a new effort by NIST to define just what cloud computing is and how its security can be assessed. "Everybody has confusion on this topic," says Peter Mell; NIST is on its 15th version of the document defining the term. "The typical cloud definition is vague enough that it encompasses all of existing modern IT,"
Given the industry’s rapid growth, the murkiness of its current security standards, and the anecdotal accounts of breakdowns, it’s not surprising that many companies still look askance at the idea of putting sensitive data in clouds. Though security is currently fairly good, cloud providers will have to prove their reliability over the long term
Cloud providers don’t yet have a virtual steel fence to sell you. But at a minimum, they can promise to keep your data on servers in, say, the United States or the European Union, for regulatory compliance or other reasons.
But fully ensuring the security of cloud computing will inevitably fall to the field of cryptography. Of course, cloud users can already encrypt data to protect it from being leaked, stolen, or–perhaps above all–released by a cloud provider facing a subpoena.
To find and retrieve encrypted documents, groups at Carnegie Mellon University, the University of California, Berkeley, and elsewhere are working on new search strategies that start by tagging encrypted cloud-based files with encrypted metadata.
"For me," Zittrain says, "the biggest issue in cloud security is not the Sidekick situation where Microsoft loses your data." More worrisome to him are "the increased ability for the government to get your stuff, and fewer constitutional protections against it; the increased ability for government to censor; and increased ability for a vendor or government to control innovation and squash truly disruptive things."